While I’m on a roll, here, I’m going to throw this out there as well. What I want to do here is expound upon the obvious future vis-a-vis Christianity, if not religion in particular.
Basically, I still contend that Christianity is a dead religion, and so is, I think, the rest of the Abrahamic nonsense.
I think the future is atheist. The principle reason why is obvious: the future is going to be written by China, the world’s premiere atheist power. And of course, Russia will play a driving force in this future as well, which is a bit of supporting evidence since the Russian government is staffed and led by people who were taught and indoctrinated in the atheist USSR.
I think the Jesus myth is doomed. And good riddance.
People follow the power. It’s the one constant of this world.
As it turns out, Mao was right all along. His cultural revolution, where he purged China of all of it’s religious basket cases, was after all the best thing that anyone could have done for his country. He was right. He was more right, I think, than even he could have realized at the time.
With the religious nuts out of the way, China was free to build it’s future upon scientific and logical principles. The Chinese leadership used reason and sound thinking to build their fortunes, unlike how we did things, here.
In the US, the leaders turned not to reason and logic but to Jesus, Islam, and Jewish crap to formulate their visions of what the future should be. They didn’t think. They didn’t use their minds. They got wrapped up in stupid, infantile fantasies about Israel and Muhammed and the Church and other fairy tale B.S. instead of using critical thought and sound reasoning.
Thus, our constant and useless involvement in Israel. No actual good has ever come of that involvement in our nation’s history, but we can’t untangle ourselves from it because of the Jesus garbage that clouds the minds of so many of our leaders.
China has no such useless entanglements, because they don’t care about religion. Religious mumbo-jumbo does not factor in, at all, in Chinese considerations when it comes to foreign policy.
Yes, there is that issue of the Dalai Lama. But it’s not like the Chinese care much about him, either way. What I’m talking about is that the Chinese would never spend literally trillions of dollars on endless wars to defend a country that has nothing to do with them because of some idiotic, fantastical crap they learned in Sunday School classes. These 2 issues- the Dalai Lama and Israel- are light years apart in import.
And Russia falls right into line with this way of thinking. Their power is on the ascendant, too, for the same reasons.
I don’t believe the nonsense that Putin and the rest of the Russian leadership are “devout Christians”. That’s a line of bull fed to the sheep, here, to keep them in the dark about what’s really happening, which seems to be standard issue with anything involving churches these days.
Putin was indoctrinated and rose through the ranks of the USSR, an ardently, inflexibly atheist society. I don’t think a “devout Christian” would have done this. Certainly, they wouldn’t have done it as easily as he did it. And this applies to the rest of the current Russian leadership, too.
At the very, very least, the Russian leadership of today must have a great internal respect for atheism and it’s benefits. It wouldn’t make sense for them not to. And Putin is fond of paying respect publicly for the old USSR, even to the point of making playing it’s music a key part of his public identity.
To that end, you would NEVER see Putin touch that moldy old wall in Israel like our own misbegotten President did. And I don’t think that it’s because Putin would be “too Christian” to do it, either. I just think that Putin probably thinks better of himself than to publicly prostrate himself before some dumb fairy tales in front of the rest of the world. Go to Church? Fine, it he wants to. But even if he does, his routine of going to church clearly doesn’t impact him in the way that it has impacted our own pea-brained leaders. Paging Dubya, here.
At any rate, Christianity and Islam and Judaism are religions best suited for times of decadence. Simply put, the Abrahamic religions in particular thrive on infantile nonsense about the “brotherhood of man” and other such stuff. That kind of thinking is only permissible, really, when people live lives of luxury and carelessness.
There’s a reason why Christianity became a fad in the spoiled, arrogant ruling families of Rome during the waning days of the Empire, and it’s the same reason why it’s a fad, here, these days, too. It’s because Christianity, like Islam, takes the easy way out on all the difficult issues. Whatever happens, you are forgiven for being a “good person” and “believing in God” and other such childish nonsense.
To that end, you can wreck your own country and everything in it, but as long as you’re a “good person” in the end, you’re forgiven. Because that’s Jesus’s way.
China has no tolerance for such childishness. Good for them. Bad for us.
The Chinese leadership has it where it counts. Their act of purging the religious idiots out of their ranks gave them the opportunity to bring in the smart people instead. And it shows. The Chinese politburo seems to have an eye on the future, not the past.
I refer again to the Silk Road project. All our own “leader” has done in response to this is make that embarrassing tour of the Abrahamic religious stops. He’s looking backwards. The Chinese are looking towards the future. Who, do you suppose, will win in the end?
And no, I don’t think that there is any way to “reform” Christianity. I’ve noticed that in right-wing blogs these days there has been an effort to “rehabilitate” Christianity, to purge it of feminism and liberalism, and of the rest of it’s supposed problems.
But feminism and liberalism aren’t the problem with Christianity. Not by a long shot. Christianity’s problem is that it is built out of the mistranslated ravings of people who died millenia ago. Christianity’s problem is that it has no place in a modern, technological society. Christianity’s problem is that no amount of “reform” is going to change the fundamental fact that it’s a bunch of fairy tales.
I’ll stop here for now. More to come, I’m sure.